交互式毛绒鲨鱼对比

Build a single-file WebGPU interactive experience featuring a soft, squishy plush shark.

Design the shark with a recognizable silhouette: a rounded body, pointed snout, dorsal fin, side fins, and a powerful tail. Give it a blue fabric exterior, cream belly, glossy black button eyes, stitched gills, and a playful mouth with small felt teeth. Make the fabric visibly fuzzy, with subtle seams and soft shadows.

Interactions:
- Grab and drag any part of the shark. Its body should stretch, squash, wobble, and settle naturally.
- Pull its tail and release to make it dash forward.
- Boop its nose for a cute reaction.
- Brush its fur with a comb tool.
- Feed it little fish and animate it chasing and eating them.
- Let it swim in gentle circles when idle.

Use convincing soft-body physics with volume preservation, springy recovery, and responsive fins and tail. Avoid rigid movement or excessive jitter.

Include controls for stuffing firmness, fur length, swimming speed, and color palettes. Add reset, feed, dash, and wireframe buttons.

Present everything in a polished minimalist interface with a warm off-white background, elegant typography, a compact settings panel, and the title “Plush Shark.”

Deliver one self-contained HTML file with all code and assets embedded. Use WebGPU for rendering, support mouse and touch, and keep the experience smooth and responsive.

出处：作者在原帖下的回复。提示词保留原文语言，未做改写。

作者提到的工具

更多模型对比案例

• 0:42

  AI自画像挑战：Sonnet5.5对比GPT-6 Astra

  724.8万 播放

• 0:28

  Opus 5.5 对比 GPT-6 Astra 武士游戏演示

  111.4万 播放

• 0:30

  GPT-6 Astra对比Claude Opus5.5

  60.2万 播放

• 0:22

  Grok与Opus摸草模拟器成本对比

  55万 播放

• 0:44

  Opus5.5对比GPT-6 Sol虚幻引擎游戏开发

  53.7万 播放

• 0:13

  闪粉贴纸效果对比

  47.1万 播放