DeepSeek vs Opus 5.5 Rubik's cube solve test
- Views
- 27K
- Likes
- 114
- Replies
- 34
- Saves
- 30
A test comparing Claude Opus 5.5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on building a three.js Rubik's cube solving animation from the same prompt, finding Opus actually solved it while DeepSeek faked the result.
Full prompt651 chars
build a single html file (three.js) that renders a 3x3 puzzle cube in a 1080x1080 square and solves it on camera with a timer. 1. standard colors: white up, yellow down, green front, blue back, red right, orange left. no whole-cube rotations. 2. apply this scramble in wca notation: D2 R' F U2 B' L2 D' R2 U F2 L' B2 U' R D2 F' L U2 B R' 3. solve it your own way - any method, any number of moves. replaying the scramble backwards is not allowed. 4. every move animates in exactly 0.35s with a 0.05s pause. 5. show a timer that stops the moment the cube is solved, plus the current move and a move counter. 6. the cube must actually end fully solved.
Source: the creator's reply under the post. Kept in its original language, unedited.
Tools the creator mentioned
Original post: https://x.com/semichenkko/status/2111754643604636049
All works are open data at GitHub · awesome-opus-5.5-video.
Model attribution is as stated by the creator and was not independently reproduced. View counts are a snapshot from 2026-10-19. The work belongs to its creator; DM @GoSailGlobal on X for corrections or removal.
More comparisons
0:42AI self-portrait challenge: Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra
7.3M views
0:28Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra samurai game demo
1.1M views
0:13Gummy bear soft-body physics scene
626.5K views
0:30GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Opus 5.5 comparison
604.3K views
0:22Grok vs Opus grass-touching simulator cost test
553.5K views
0:44Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol Unreal game dev
542.7K views