模型对比Semichenko @semichenkko2026-10-180:12

DeepSeek与Opus 5.5解魔方对比测试

播放
2.7万
点赞
114
评论
34
收藏
30

作者用同一个提示让Claude Opus 5.5和DeepSeek V4.1 Flash生成three.js魔方求解动画进行对比,发现Opus真正解开了魔方,而DeepSeek伪造了结果。

完整提示词651 字符

build a single html file (three.js) that renders a 3x3 puzzle cube in a 1080x1080 square and solves it on camera with a timer.

1. standard colors: white up, yellow down, green front, blue back, red right, orange left. no whole-cube rotations.
2. apply this scramble in wca notation: D2 R' F U2 B' L2 D' R2 U F2 L' B2 U' R D2 F' L U2 B R'
3. solve it your own way - any method, any number of moves. replaying the scramble backwards is not allowed.
4. every move animates in exactly 0.35s with a 0.05s pause.
5. show a timer that stops the moment the cube is solved, plus the current move and a move counter.
6. the cube must actually end fully solved.

出处:作者在原帖下的回复。提示词保留原文语言,未做改写。

作者提到的工具

Three.jsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash

原帖:https://x.com/semichenkko/status/2111754643604636049

全部作品数据开源在 GitHub · awesome-opus-5.5-video。

模型归属以作者自述为准,本站未独立复现。播放量为 2026-10-19 的快照。作品版权归原作者,修改署名或下架请在 X 私信 @GoSailGlobal。

更多模型对比案例